The ads share the same database on both sites. Also, while the products can/may be explicit, the ads themselves usually aren't (maybe just REALLY questionable at times.)
This thread was also a poor location to ask about that. The Friendly thread would've been a more approriate for a simple inquiry like that.
This thread was also a poor location to ask about that. The Friendly thread would've been a more approriate for a simple inquiry like that.
thanks for the info
will post trivialities to friendly forum from now on
will post trivialities to friendly forum from now on
What about receiving a message when someone quotes your message?
Or do I something wrong that I never get one?
Or do I something wrong that I never get one?
We're no where near a social site. Facebook we are not. We're an image archive first and foremost.
I've suggested minor proposals (like an RSS feed for the comments and forums), but that's as far as we're willing to go. All the "social" functions added to the site were tacked on to help facilitate its main role. The social community aspect is a side-effect, nothing more.
I've suggested minor proposals (like an RSS feed for the comments and forums), but that's as far as we're willing to go. All the "social" functions added to the site were tacked on to help facilitate its main role. The social community aspect is a side-effect, nothing more.
Sorry, but what is quoting for, when the answer to the question i asked about the picture never reaches me?
Thats why you stop being lazy and either mark the image/thread and come back to it. This is a image site not a social site, so the coding is based around image hosting, be happy you get the social bits we have.
It's a quick way to copy and paste a message from someone so readers know the context the reply was made in. Let what I just did in this post.trinkschokolade said:
Sorry, but what is quoting for, when the answer to the question i asked about the picture never reaches me?
It doesn't work to take features of other sites for granted and expect them to be available everywhere you go. In fact, MANY forums don't support reply notification like you're trying to suggest.
I suggest you get used to manually checking the site if you want to keep up to date on anything here other than new posts (there's and ATOM/RSS feed for that). Even staff has to manually check the site on their own accord.
There should be a "high heels" tag.
Wrong thread to propose that.
how about when you enter to the homepage show the most popular pictures or not the most popular maybe random pictures for day, like, one day is a holiday, show the most popular post of that holiday, for example:
"someone: ohhh! im gonna enter in konachan to see whats new on this page because its christmas today, i enter and... oh i see a greatful picture i maybe see other pictures of this tags, and see what other tags has and what about the comments"
and konachan has the most popular picture of christmas ( and if its any day put a picture that surely be popular) and for other holidays like easter day you may put a popular picture of a bunny likely
if you can´t do it, i will be pleasure if someone answer me if can or not, arigato gosaimasu
"someone: ohhh! im gonna enter in konachan to see whats new on this page because its christmas today, i enter and... oh i see a greatful picture i maybe see other pictures of this tags, and see what other tags has and what about the comments"
and konachan has the most popular picture of christmas ( and if its any day put a picture that surely be popular) and for other holidays like easter day you may put a popular picture of a bunny likely
if you can´t do it, i will be pleasure if someone answer me if can or not, arigato gosaimasu
I think we should have a setting that allow us to control how much pictures we see on a single page
That's what the popular page is for. As for holiday stuff, those are actual tags. We only tag obvious holidays taht have a particular art style to them and celebrated by the JPN. Easter, BTW, is not one of them. There are workarounds to doing rank-based filtering of tags, but that's not worth the time and effort. The Popular page is enough for the time being. We don't really need themed rankings.TakeThis said:
how about when you enter to the homepage show the most popular pictures or not the most popular maybe random pictures for day, like, one day is a holiday, show the most popular post of that holiday[...]
I asked about this 2 years ago. It would render the cache system nearly worthless. Without a viable cache, the server would have to generate new pageview content on practically every request for each user. That would just strain the system and slow everything down for everyone. This is not gonna happen, not with our current resources.kiddspaded said:
I think we should have a setting that allow us to control how much pictures we see on a single page
it's implemented with &limit argument, if you really need it.how much pictures we see on a single page
That doesn't get advertised much (on purpose) because it breaks cache. At this point, LIMIT is really meant for people who have a real need for it, like mods and maybe contribs. It helps with managing images. I've used it to help clear out dupes on specific tags and apply parent/child relationships properly (i.e. on posts that are missing the relationship).
Question, so when I want to browse images "nearby" a target, I shouldn't use the limit argument? For instance, I asked about this a long time ago.. if I am looking at post X, and I want to check the posted images around it, what I'd do is to open the url post/index?page=10&tags=id:..(X+209)".StahnAileron said:
That doesn't get advertised much (on purpose) because it breaks cache...
I was thinking of adding a "limit=400" so I only retrieve 20 pages (so I get 10 before and 10 after) rather than retrieving all of them to the very last one (in this case, the very first one).
Should I not do that? (maybe I misread your explanation of how it works).
I know, but it's on public API documentation page :)That doesn't get advertised much
(btw, we should update it, wrong version and link)
anyway, i don't believe that we have many "advanced" users who'll use it - so no harm intended with my disclosure.
(otherwise forgive me please)
UPD: &limit is limited to 100 :P
@SK7000
i'll answer to dmail
Assuming naikoto hasn't already told you:SK7000 said:
Question, so when I want to browse images "nearby" a target, I shouldn't use the limit argument? For instance, I asked about this a long time ago.. if I am looking at post X, and I want to check the posted images around it, what I'd do is to open the url post/index?page=10&tags=id:..(X+209)".
I was thinking of adding a "limit=400" so I only retrieve 20 pages (so I get 10 before and 10 after) rather than retrieving all of them to the very last one (in this case, the very first one).
Should I not do that? (maybe I misread your explanation of how it works).
LIMIT is a PER PAGE display meta-tag. It tells the system how many thumbnails to display on each page of a search, not a window of images to look at. If you want a range of images to look at, the range form of the ID meta-tag is what you're looking for:
The LIMIT meta-tag, from what Shuugo tells me, completely breaks cache since it's a variable and the server needs to generate a new page view according to the search parameters for it (thumbs/page). Granted, not many people know of it, much less use it. It's not really that bad so long as you don't use it on a regular basis (i.e. all the time for all your searches.)
The limit on LIMIT naikoto mentions is for the API command, not the search Meta-tag. Those are 2 different things, far as I know.
Wrong thread.
Say, I think this belongs here...
Can we add url formatting to the help for dtext? It seems to be the only thing missing in that page.
Can we add url formatting to the help for dtext? It seems to be the only thing missing in that page.
Noted for fixingSK7000 said:
Say, I think this belongs here...
Can we add url formatting to the help for dtext? It seems to be the only thing missing in that page.
I have no idea if it was suggested already - but how about an option to click "Size" in the post view to see every post with this exact height and width? As this option of searching by size is already implemented, should be easy enough to add :)
That's kinda... vague. Can you expand on your suggestion a bit so we have a better idea of what you're trying to ask of us? What width and height are you referring to?
Not sure if this has been suggested, but an option to sort our favorites into user defined categories/folders would be awesome
That's what tags are for already.asdf115 said:
Not sure if this has been suggested, but an option to sort our favorites into user defined categories/folders would be awesome
For example if I want to search for gokou_ruri between my favorites/subscriptions:
sub:Shuugo:Characters gokou_ruri
To expand on this: This site is a simple archive, not a personal organization site (even if it started off as Shuugo trying to organize his wallpaper collection via crowdsourcing).
Danbooru (and moebooru by extension) are NOT designed to be that indepth at the user-level. Honestly (and to be blunt), if you want that amount of organization, take the time and effort to DL the files and use your OS to organize files. Nothing is stopping you from actually downloading the images.
I (and probably many outher users) have massive directories on my system to store my files. I've gotten more picky about what I download from the various 'boorus, but I use them as they present themselves at the basic level: a image repository I pull image from. (If you bother to look, I only have a handful of images favorited. All of them are former avatars I've used and that's the sole reason they're even favorited. Otherwise, my favorites would be blank.)
Adding personal sorting functions to the site goes far beyond its intended (and simple) purpose.
Danbooru (and moebooru by extension) are NOT designed to be that indepth at the user-level. Honestly (and to be blunt), if you want that amount of organization, take the time and effort to DL the files and use your OS to organize files. Nothing is stopping you from actually downloading the images.
I (and probably many outher users) have massive directories on my system to store my files. I've gotten more picky about what I download from the various 'boorus, but I use them as they present themselves at the basic level: a image repository I pull image from. (If you bother to look, I only have a handful of images favorited. All of them are former avatars I've used and that's the sole reason they're even favorited. Otherwise, my favorites would be blank.)
Adding personal sorting functions to the site goes far beyond its intended (and simple) purpose.
maybe a way to view all your favorited images full size without constantly clicking on them one after another, like a in-built slide viewer where all your pics come up in one session.
Just use the post browse function.BattosaiLuffy said:
maybe a way to view all your favorited images full size without constantly clicking on them one after another, like a in-built slide viewer where all your pics come up in one session.
http://konachan.com/post/browse
For example for mine would be:
http://konachan.com/post/browse#/vote:>=1:Shuugo%20order:vote
Gregol
about 1 year ago