Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Recent evidence considered, it seems to me that it makes sense to regard the Kanmusu-tachi as anthropomorphisms, at least usually (possibly excluding the Shinkaisei-kan, fairies, etc. and maybe some odd individual cases)... But that doesn't necessarily automatically become a reason to tag them as such.
I was under the impression that one of the primary reasons we weren't tagging them as anthros is because the sheer volume of posts involved would dilute the anthropomorphism tag. If the majority of searches for anthros on Konachan would thus have "-kantai_collection" included in their search, is it still worthwhile to tag them? Or is it a waste?
minabiTestAccount
over 7 years agoI was under the impression that one of the primary reasons we weren't tagging them as anthros is because the sheer volume of posts involved would dilute the anthropomorphism tag. If the majority of searches for anthros on Konachan would thus have "-kantai_collection" included in their search, is it still worthwhile to tag them? Or is it a waste?