This post was deleted. Reason: Quality - Poor BG quality (compression noise, blocking, upscale). MD5: aadf9466667c64933abc8f10286161ac

Edit | Respond


too bad the background is crappy
crappy isn't enough to express the real awfulness of the backgroud, I'd say - it's horrible.
I think the background was a nice concept but it needs better quality, better texture, stars instead of the black background part, a base where luka can actually stand up so she doesn't seem like floating in nowhere, luka looks cool though.
I think it's ok, the artist has not done a lot of pictures.
I don´t think that you "experts" can draw this way.
gnarf1975 said:
I don´t think that you "experts" can draw this way.
I prefer actual drawing over digital drawing,and I wasn't talking about the character,I was talking about the background - it really ruins the picture.
gnarf1975 said:
I don´t think that you "experts" can draw this way.
Very true, but the choice in BG is pretty poor in the technical sense:

  • basic visual quality looks like an upscale
  • which is compounded by the excessively visible compression noise/artifacting
Luka herself is fine. It's the BG everyone seems to be having issues with. Which, judging from the great disparity of quality between Luka and the BG (not to mention style), is probably a stock photo from some place and not "drawn" but the artist anyway.
I want to see the version without this BG. Anyone else?
You can't comment right now.
Either you are not logged in, or your account is less than 2 weeks old.
For more information on how to comment, head to comment guidelines.