This post belongs to a parent post.
animal_ears fingering foxgirl inakoi jpeg_artifacts masturbation red_eyes third-party_edit whirlpool white_hair

Edit | Respond

Well this is strange. Why is she alone when she has a whole den full of fox girls?
Well tie me up naked and leave me behind a bar, a fan kisumification? It's not half bad either! There is a good deal of artifacts on the previously darker parts of the tail, and in the eyes, but that's pretty hard to help. It's saved in PNG, which is good. Someone sure knows what they're doing with those clear edges too. Unfortunately, the artifacts might be a bit much for the scrutinizing eyes of Stahn the man and Sci.

As for that Tiki... I can masturbate by myself if I want to, too! There's not always time to head back to the den, or easy targets around.

All this being said... I hope I'm not putting my foot in my mouth. It could possibly be a coincidental photoshop of a white haired, red eyed perverted foxgirl who is not intended to be Kisumi. Though it was uploaded by K1TSUNE, who I suspect is part of the secret cult of Kisuminism.
I know K1TSUNE in real life and he spent a lot of time on this, as he said when he was working on it, it "had more artifacts than an archaeological dig site" all and all though it came out very good and its one of my favorites.
I can see that. If he uses filter > blur > smart blur (in photoshop) you can clean up most of the painfully obvious artifacts. While you're at it... ask him if he's a Kisumi fanboy or just weirdly and coincidentally being similar to me. *whistles*
kisumi said:
While you're at it... ask him if he's a Kisumi fanboy or just weirdly and coincidentally being similar to me. *whistles*
The former. As for the filters I tried using blur and noise removal to get rid of the artifacts but by the time I got them to remove alot of the artifacts, It removed too much detail. So I ended up spending a few hours manually blending the artifacts.
Well that finally puts that mystery to rest! Now to find out about the other three...

Anyway, did you use smart blur? It tends to leave most detail intact, just blur the flat and gradiant areas.
I find that the noise remover, even the supposed jpeg artefact option is not very good in photoshop.
Smart blur is my usual method for cleaning too.
kisumi said:
Well that finally puts that mystery to rest! Now to find out about the other three...

Anyway, did you use smart blur? It tends to leave most detail intact, just blur the flat and gradiant areas.
He wouldn't do that, he tends to like to spend a lot of time on his work and usually takes the hard way in these things. I mean it does take more time but he wants the best quality he can get, and anyway he likes doing things the hard way.
But that's... umm... smart blur does do it better than any other method, and it takes a few seconds rather than hours. It's just the overall better tool for the job.
kisumi said:
But that's... umm... smart blur does do it better than any other method, and it takes a few seconds rather than hours. It's just the overall better tool for the job.
I will try this, sorry my friend gets a little confused sometimes.
To be honest this was my first photoshop project so I'm rather new to CS5, thank you for the advice.
You can't comment right now.
Either you are not logged in, or your account is less than 2 weeks old.
For more information on how to comment, head to comment guidelines.